User Tools

Site Tools


terminal:comparison

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
terminal:comparison [2020/12/19 21:41] senioradminterminal:comparison [2021/01/16 22:43] (current) – [Footprint] senioradmin
Line 1: Line 1:
 +====== Terminal Emulators: Comparison  ======
 +
 +  * **[[terminal:mlterm]]** a multilingual terminal emulator on X11. It has a low memory footprint and offers configuration by command line and a graphical tool.
 +  * [[terminal:xterm]] The default terminal emulator on X11. Is has support for unicode and truetype fonts. Configuration via ''.Xresources'' or popup menu. Memory footprint is moderate.
 +  * [[terminal:urxvt]] highly extendable (with Perl) unicode enabled terminal emulator
 +
 +
 +
 ===== Footprint ===== ===== Footprint =====
 +On: Artix Linux
 +
 +From low to high in kB
  
-^Command ^Version                          ^USS      ^PSS      ^RSS^+^Command ^Version ^[[:glossary#USS|USS]] ^[[:glossary#PSS|PSS]] ^[[:glossary#RSS|RSS]]^
 |xterm  |362   |4112 |5277  |8800| |xterm  |362   |4112 |5277  |8800|
 |mlterm  |3.9.0                          |7200     |8744    |12500| |mlterm  |3.9.0                          |7200     |8744    |12500|
-|xterm (using TrueType Font)|362 |9188|10356|13988|+|xterm (using xft font)|362 |9188|10356|13988|
 |urxvt  |9.22                          |9160     |10418    |13972| |urxvt  |9.22                          |9160     |10418    |13972|
  
Line 10: Line 21:
 ===== Recommendation ===== ===== Recommendation =====
  
-Although xterm has the lowest memory footprint, it has only so when using bitmap fonts. Those have some disadvantages as not relly being scalable. When using xft fonts the memory usage of xterm rises considerably.+Although xterm has the lowest memory footprint, it has only so when using bitmap fonts. Those have some disadvantages as not really being scalable. When using xft fonts the memory usage of xterm rises considerably.
  
-urxvt was one a lightweight alternatove to xterm. Now it has a bigger footprint then the mother of all X11 terminal emulators.+urxvt was one a lightweight alternative to xterm. Now it has a bigger footprint then the mother of all X11 terminal emulators.
  
 mlterm was surprisingly the terminal emulator with the lowest footprint when using xft fonts. Additionally it offers configuration by using a command line tool for experienced users as well as a GUI. So this is the recommended terminal emulator. mlterm was surprisingly the terminal emulator with the lowest footprint when using xft fonts. Additionally it offers configuration by using a command line tool for experienced users as well as a GUI. So this is the recommended terminal emulator.
terminal/comparison.1608414096.txt.gz · Last modified: 2020/12/19 21:41 by senioradmin

Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC0 1.0 Universal
CC0 1.0 Universal Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki