Simple Tools

User Tools

Site Tools

Trace:
wm:stacking:comparison

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
wm:stacking:comparison [2021/01/28 21:10] – senioradminwm:stacking:comparison [2021/01/28 21:15] – senioradmin
Line 47: Line 47:
 Many stacking window managers are easy or very easy to use for novice users. Some do resemble a classic layout from Microsoft's proprietary OS. So we did choose the most lightweight of this easy to use window managers, and this is **Fluxbox** Many stacking window managers are easy or very easy to use for novice users. Some do resemble a classic layout from Microsoft's proprietary OS. So we did choose the most lightweight of this easy to use window managers, and this is **Fluxbox**
  
-Fluxbox is one of the most popular lightweight window managers. It is usable right out of the box and highly configurable. The the most similar competitor is **Openbox**, which is no surprise, because they share the same ancestor Blackbox. +Fluxbox is one of the most popular lightweight window managers. It is usable right out of the box and highly configurable. The most similar competitor is **Openbox**, which is no surprise, because they share the same ancestor Blackbox. 
  
 If you are coming from a Microsoft system and are looking for an experience which you are used to have a look at **icewm**. If you are coming from a Microsoft system and are looking for an experience which you are used to have a look at **icewm**.
wm/stacking/comparison.txt · Last modified: 2021/01/28 21:16 by senioradmin
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC0 1.0 Universal
CC0 1.0 Universal Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki