wm:stacking:comparison
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
wm:stacking:comparison [2021/01/28 21:10] – senioradmin | wm:stacking:comparison [2021/01/28 21:16] (current) – [For experienced users] senioradmin | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
Many stacking window managers are easy or very easy to use for novice users. Some do resemble a classic layout from Microsoft' | Many stacking window managers are easy or very easy to use for novice users. Some do resemble a classic layout from Microsoft' | ||
- | Fluxbox is one of the most popular lightweight window managers. It is usable right out of the box and highly configurable. The the most similar competitor is **Openbox**, | + | Fluxbox is one of the most popular lightweight window managers. It is usable right out of the box and highly configurable. The most similar competitor is **Openbox**, |
If you are coming from a Microsoft system and are looking for an experience which you are used to have a look at **icewm**. | If you are coming from a Microsoft system and are looking for an experience which you are used to have a look at **icewm**. | ||
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
==== For experienced users ==== | ==== For experienced users ==== | ||
- | Experienced users might prefer a window manager which is completely controllable by keyboard shortcuts and stays out of the way. This criteria are met by **cwm**. It has a minimalist interface, a short but comprehensive documentation it is the default window manager of OpenBSD (where it is also developed). | + | Experienced users might prefer a window manager which is completely controllable by keyboard shortcuts and stays out of the way. This criteria are met by **cwm**. It has a minimalist interface, a short but comprehensive documentation |
wm/stacking/comparison.1611868214.txt.gz · Last modified: 2021/01/28 21:10 by senioradmin